Category: Article

  • What kind of friend is Canada?

    In recent weeks, the Liberal Party of Canada has attempted to engineer its resurrection by foisting the spectre of America as Canada’s enemy. This accompanied by a choreographed leadership campaign married to a politically-motivated prorogation of Parliament that should have most Canadians outraged. It is lamentable that it does not and certainly does not bode well for our future that Canadians have not demanded a return of Parliament and is evidence of our further slide into the swamp of apathy.

    Do Canadians even have the capacity for independent thought any longer? We used to snobbishly look down at our American cousins because we “understood” what was going on in the world. We sewed the maple leaf to our backpacks and pompously declared that the average Canadian could name at least six countries in Europe and maybe even their capital cities. Oh, how things have changed. The average Canadian, spoon-fed the socialist pablum of the CBC and the bilge of the other corporate media eunuchs are stretched to name anyone prominent in history outside the celebrated heroes of victimhood, which has replaced history in the first post-national state. If the polls are to be believed, and I think there is some chicanery in them, a great swath of the Canadian sheeple have returned to the Liberal fold, believing that a two-time central banker and trustee of the World Economic Forum is their saviour.

    Canadians, when asked why President Trump is acting this way to Canada, do not for an instant think that perhaps maybe our current government might have something to do with it. Yes, President Trump will not rest until the Stars and Stripes fly over the subdued remains of South Porcupine. I hate to break it to you folks, the whole 51st state thing is a ruse meant to knock Canadian negotiators back on their heels, and it worked splendidly. Donald Trump did not like the trade deal he negotiated during his first term, and a good collection of his advisors on the issue are back for the victory lap. Certainly, he would like to secure access to Canadian resources at the best possible price, but he envisions a transaction not an invasion.

    Perhaps we might consider what Trump’s worldview is, along with that of his principal advisors. It might be a shock to some that his views might actually be widely held in the national security community. One must look to statements made by others, including from past administrations about how Canada has come to be viewed in Washington. Certainly, the days of “Irish eyes are smiling,” and Canadian soldiers punching way above their weight class in Kandahar are long gone, replaced with the smug patronizing words and actions of the Prince Dauphin, Justin the First and his band of entitled social justice warriors, Karens and legions of “consultants.” 

    Canadians need to face facts. Canada under this abominable government have become not just freeloaders and whinging do-nothings; they have on many occasions taken actions that have jeopardized the Western Alliance and our American neighbours.  Getting the Canadian government to drop Huawei from building a great deal of our 5G network was the modern equivalent of shoveling out the Augean stables. Canada has sold significant stake in our resources to Chinese companies. The former Director General of Intelligence of the RCMP, Cameron Otis, was convicted of spying for a foreign power and given a paltry 14-year sentence when by all rights he should have been on a one-way trip to Tyburn. In 2019, Obama senior advisor Susan Rice questioned if Canada should continue to be in the intelligence-sharing relationship referred to as the Five Eyes. Recently those concerns have been raised again.

    Doing business with China can be an essential part of economic prosperity, but when your closest ally, and that includes Democrats and Republicans, question your commitment to national security and trustworthiness then perhaps you might conclude that the foundation for continued trust and comradery is eroded. A firm grasp of Chinese history and likely motivations must underpin our engagement with them; trust but verify.

    Enter Justin Trudeau who cannot seem to miss the opportunity to make some bold pronouncement, whether it is on Canada’s newfound resolve or his preference for Trump’s soundly-defeated opponent. Justin Trudeau is the anathema to everything the Trump administration portrays. Trump has many reasons to dislike Trudeau, and no reason to forgive. Whether forgiveness is a virtue Trump possesses remains a question, but that is largely irrelevant; Trudeau has transgressed and continues to do so. Despite his “resignation,” he simply won’t shut up or simply go away.

    What the Liberals have done to the Canadian military is criminal, eliminating combat effectiveness and readiness with tattooed zampolits enforcing the edict “diversity is our strength.” Well, our officer corps might understand gender dysphoria, but I doubt highly they can execute a mission. Our procurement, no doubt rife with graft, is a disgrace. Our shipbuilding program is 10 years delayed and almost 300% over budget. We had to lease F-18s from Australia as ours, service well-done, belong in museums or as exhibitions in front of local Legion halls.

    Intelligence and espionage have always been characterized as the world of the shadows. Canadians perhaps should wonder what we do not know. We certainly do not know the details of foreign interference in our elections, despite two pathetic attempts to whitewash the whole affair. We still don’t know the names, and it is pathetic that Canadians haven’t demanded them.

    Canada has a robust defense industry, highly integrated with that of the U.S. Have these companies, or the projects that they are working on, been compromised? Has the Trudeau government moved forcefully to protect advanced technologies or, like so many of its other failings and questionable decisions, moved to cloak these breaches in secrecy and denial? If U.S. national security is largely based on maintaining a technological edge, will they be comfortable with an “ally” who are vulnerable to theft?

    I am a realist in my view of foreign policy and national security. I see Canada’s future as a robust one, so long as we understand how our growth, our culture and our standard of living have been and remain inexorably tied to our American cousins. Donald Trump is not a dictator, nor does he plan to be one. He is a patriot who follows a Nixonian view of the world sharpened by his experience of building a real estate empire in New York City, where manners and nuance come a distant second to street sense and a good right cross. He was elected in a landslide and is widely supported by Americans who see him as the tonic to domestic rot and international decline. Canadians need to accept that fact.

    It is time for Canadians to step back and ask the key questions: why are the Americans doing what they are doing? And did our government’s negligence and questionable loyalty drive them to it?

    This article also appears on LinkedIn.

  • Why bring an economist to a poker game?

    The decision of the Trump Administration to impose a 25% across the board tariff on the import of Canadian goods, with a lower tariff on oil, has been analysed ad nauseum by economists and policy wonks in Canada. They rightly point out that it will actually increase costs to the American consumer, and that when you net out oil the US actually enjoys a trade surplus with Canada.

    They are all missing the point. There have been some who have raised the possibility that this is part of a new economic strategy being adopted by the new administration. Eschewing “free” trade arrangements and using tariffs to create revenue to allow for a commensurate decrease in U.S income tax, both individual and corporate might have some underlying relevance to the imposition of tariffs. Fears of a new age of mercantilism are secondary at best to the analysis, although all of the discourse and analysis has been well meaning and largely helpful. If the voter can understand policy and critical thinking this bodes well for democracy.

    One need looks at how President Trump has approached every “challenge” in his life. For him, in many cases it is a zero-sum game, or at least he better be seen as winning in the eyes of the public. Trump approaches policy from a Nixonian perspective, and adds in the dominant criteria, personal relationship, and character as the dominant factor. He speaks of having good or great relationships with many world leaders, many who are considered pariahs by the policy apparatus and mainstream media. There is creditability to his weltanschauung, as evidenced by the capitulation of Hamas and the meaningful progress towards resolution of the war in Ukraine.

    I am not saying this is the “right” way to do trade and foreign policy, but the Imperial model is what we have, and for the sake of Canada’s economy we better understand that and implement policies that cater to that. Trump is singularly focused on winning in the wake of a failed Biden administration where appeasement, faux brinksmanship and capitulation were the primary characteristics. He feels the call of history, to save his country, restore it to greatness and to firmly carve his name into history. Donald Trump, love him or hate him (there is no middle) is simply the most consequential President since Ronald Reagan.

    In Canada’s case I have written that this is the time for introspection as well. The current government, which stinks like rotten fish, is attempting to use Trump’s tariffs as a new wedge issue and Hail Mary to keep power at all costs and cover up the most despicable record in Canadian history. This has more to due with the once proud Liberal Party of Canada that has transformed into a cult of personality, and redistribution conduit to the donor class. My commentary regarding the current Prime Minister has been called “hate” by some. My unfiltered language does borrow from literature, history, and philosophy, and certainly might be at times vitriolic, but given the damage done to this once great country, which may be irreparable, by Mr. Trudeau and his quisling co-conspirators, I get a pass on that.

    Canada needs to first arrest the threat of tariffs by getting on Trump’s good side. Premier Smith has taken the right course, and lower tariffs on oil is the immediate result. Doug Ford, running for re-election, has no choice to adopt some form of bravado, but might consider a pilgrimage to Mar a Lago. Ford and Trump are both personal relationships focused and likely find common ground. The primary issue in all of this dispute, in my opinion is based on one personal relationship alone, not economics, not shared history, not even “common sense.”  Justin Trudeau is an effete elitist, the very definition of silver spooned, who is in every measure a zealot on the issues of a perceived climate emergency and gender. He embodies everything that Donald Trump hates. Add to this the fact that Trudeau simply cannot keep his mouth shut, that he has not missed an opportunity to insult Trump now, during the campaign, and throughout his debauched 10-year government.

    Canada needs to address structural issues that have prevented it from its true potential. Wide open immigration which has upended our social safety net, made entry level employment impossible for “old stock” Canadians and contributed to a marked increase in crime needs to reverse. (Please note, I do not blame these folks for working hard. I do blame lazy Canadians who since COVID have become addicted to government). Legalization of drugs (beyond cannabis) has not resulted in control of that market, but instead accelerated widespread addiction, urban decay, and crime. Our military has been transformed into a band of out of shape, unarmed social justice warriors due to command structure which is dominated by Soviet style zampolits rather than war fighters. Interprovincial trade, pipelines, supply management are all things that need to be addressed and remedied in short order.

    But the central problem remains the continued public presence of Justin Trudeau. He simply will not go away.  There is no “conversion on the road to Damascus” coming for President Trump. He demands a very public win. And like the recent 24-hour dispute with Colombia, that win must seen as victory in a clash of personalities. This win is simply defined, Justin Trudeau must leave office immediately. Justin Trudeau must realize or be told; he has no hand to play. It is time to fold and leave the table. Parliament must be recalled and an election called. There is no constitutional provision of fiat that says the Liberal Party of Canada has a God given right to pick a leader before an election. They can go into the campaign and pick their leader after they are dealt the electoral obliteration they so clearly deserve.

    In the resolute words of Lord Amery, Depart, I say, and let have done with you. In the name of God, go.

    This article also appears on LinkedIn.

  • How Donald Trump Saved Canada

    The inauguration of Donald Trump to his second term following a campaign by which Trump dominated by every electoral metric including popular vote, swing states and overall victory in the Electoral College has been either discounted or not understood by the current Canadian government, and unfortunately too many Canadians. The defeat of Kamala Harris was not just a defeat of the weakest Democratic candidate since Michael Dukakis, but a repudiation, in fact a “smack down,” of Obamaism and the “progressivism” that some have said characterized his politics and policies. Identity politics, bloated government, diminishment of national pride with a commensurate decline in military prowess (real or perceived), lawlessness, open borders, and a threat to core principles of the American Dream have been stopped cold and with Tocquevillian predictability the American state has returned to its aspirational trajectory.

    Canadians have coiled in the recent threat to impose an across-the-board 25% tariff on Canadian exports. They understand at a DNA level that such actions would not just be harmful to Canada, but potentially existential. This has left many in a pondering quandary, wondering why Trump has made such bellicose threats and how we might stop them. Some, not gauging to any extent that Canada came to a gun fight with a herring, make ludicrous counter threats such as “everything is on the table” (note here that I completely applaud the actions and statements of Doug Ford, who is doing exactly what the Premier of Ontario should be doing).

    I have written tireless volumes on why Justin Trudeau is without measure the worst Prime Minister that Canada has ever endured. He took his father’s penchant for generating national discord and transformed it into a Frankenstein’s monster with real economic effects, most notably for Western Canada, but also for the whole country. His zealous devotion to woke ideology and gender nonsense, coupled with a self-righteous personality makes him a truly loathsome creature. That would all have been tolerable had Trudeau not, on countless occasions, taken the opportunity to take a “progressive” swipe at Donald Trump, his policies and quite frankly the vision of America shared by a majority of its citizens.

    Trump’s response, called petulant by some, is completely expected. His call to absorb Canada as the 51st state speaks from Trump’s core values of celebrating victory and displaying trophies. Whether Canada should (less Quebec) become part of the United States I fear is an expanded essay if not a book project in itself. I would simply say that Trudeau’s fundamental and harmful rendering of Canada over the last ten years makes it impossible to dismiss the call to statehood out of hand. My own preference is a common market without a currency union but with unified defence command (Canada would maintain separate units and regiments).

    The immediate Canadian tariff crisis is ended with one simple action, namely the immediate departure by the Little Prince from public life. He can retire to Tofino where he has apparently constructed a small palace to enjoy his halcyon years of planned surfing, yoga, and rainbow unicorn pronouncements. Perhaps his recent interviews on CNN and MSNBC were in fact auditions.

    Trump is well-advised on Canadian issues and politics. Some of his key advisors have substantial and tangible ties to Canada. Their views are anti-Laurentian elite, anti-woke, anti-bloated government and pro-profit, pro-resource and in many ways pro-Canadian (at least what Canada was and should be again). Once Trudeau has departed – and make no mistake, the Governor General by proroguing Parliament not only failed in her constitutional duty, but also has done great harm to this country – we can get on with repairing our relationship with the United States.

    Repairing that relationship must be done in the context of President Trump’s weltanschauung. Canada must enact substantive immigration reform, returning to the Harper-era “points system” and asking forcefully many who came here under opaque reasons to return home. That must be matched with collective federal and provincial action to deliver a swift kick in the ass who think that living off the dole is acceptable (this is what happens when you lock your population in their homes and give them free money). The new federal government must unfetter the energy sector, allowing for the rising tide of being an energy superpower status to float all boats. This federal government has horribly treated Alberta and Saskatchewan and they must be allowed to enjoy the potential fruits of a rejuvenated Confederation. Canada must finally step up a be a true partner in defending the continent and as a “paid up” NATO member. We must repair our relationship with the Five Eyes countries. The announcement that Canada would buy six nuclear powered submarines as part of the AUKUS program is fundamental. We must also commit to being able to field three combat ready brigades with full logistical and counter air support within 5 years. This would be accompanied with a serious increase in pay for CAF members and potential recruits.

    But Canadians need to step off of their moral high ground of “middleness.” The demand for compromise and genuflection at the false concept that we culturally and politically occupy the “middle ground” must be jettisoned. We are not Hobbits. Many of us understand that Canada in its current state is not anything close to “middle.”  A Laurentian Leviathan has consumed its cultural and societal ethos. As certainly as Leviathan must be stopped, which includes a transformational reduction in the legions of sitting-at-home bureaucrats and a program from cradle to grave (even if you did not ask for them), the Canadian mindset needs to return to what it was once. An appreciation of what it meant to be a Canadian.

    When recently asked what a Canadian was, our “don’t let the door hit you in the ass as you leave” Prime Minister answered, “It isn’t being American.”  That in addition to being wrong, as you cannot define something as important as national ethos with a single negative, was the encapsulation of everything that is wrong with Justin Trudeau and his smug group of carpetbagging quislings who have wrecked a once great country. Canada very much has a positive ethos and Canadians, and their institutions must reaffirm this. Canada is a country of quiet, polite but resolute action. Canada is a country hewn from a harsh wilderness that should create a population that turns challenge and sacrifice into success. Canadians do not beat their chest in victory (although they should, and maybe in matters of hockey they do) but opt for a quiet, self-assured smile and a handshake with our colleagues. Canada went over the top at Vimy and won a battle no one else could. Canada landed at Juno, shoulder to shoulder with our American and British brothers. Canada hit way about our weight class in Afghanistan. Canada beat the Soviets on their own ice. Canada scored two golden goal medal wins in Olympic hockey. Canada celebrated Terry Fox’s monumental act of selflessness. Canada gave us MacDonald and Cartier who brought two nations into the compact of a single country. Canada has given most of us a place to grow up a flourish in a safe and inspiring place.

    My fellow Canadians, it is time for all of us to look in the mirror and to each other and to remember and rekindle a love with this country. If we cannot go back to what the promise once was, only a decade ago, and recommit to achieving it then we have utterly lost this once wonderful place. Donald Trump is not our enemy, he has provided a rare moment of clarity for Canadians to reassess, learn and hopefully embolden themselves to a renewed partnership with the United States on terms of respect and tradition, to once again, make Canada the True North, Strong and Free.

    This post also appears on LinkedIn.

  • The Liberals are not just incompetent

    If you think the Liberals are simply incompetent, you are mistaken. There is a good degree of that, but this country is in a pronounced decline because of policies taken by this government – in an intentional fashion.

    It is all about taking property (in the form of #taxes) from the entrepreneurial, private and professional sectors, and to spend it on Liberal pet projects.

    More in this #video #short.

    *Subscribe to my rants on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@trevorparry

    #taxlawyer

    #video

    #shorts

    #paylesstax

    #capitalgains

    #LeviathanMustBeStopped

  • Will you lose your small business deduction? 

    The new, higher capital gains inclusion rate is a gut punch to professionals:  doctors, dentists, lawyers, vets, accountants, and countless others – who were using their professional corp to save.

    If you are triggering capital gains inside your corporation, and the new capital gains inclusion rate is 2/3rds and not ½, you have reduced the gross capital gain from $300K to $220K, at which you lose your small business deduction.

    Let’s face it:  most of these folks don’t have pension plans.  They were relying on an implicit promise from provincial governments to be allowed to save inside their corporation.

    Mr. Trudeau and his ilk have decided that they don’t want that to happen.

    More in this #video #short.  Subscribe to my rants on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@trevorparry

    #taxlawyer

    #video

    #shorts

    #paylesstax

    #capitalgains

    #LeviathanMustBeStopped

  • The Liberals are trying to create a panic

    Traditionally, when a budget document is introduced, the effective date is before the budget, so people can’t do planning in advance of the budget.

    Not so with the increase to the capital gains inclusion rate.  The effective date is after the budget. June 25, specifically.  The Liberals are doing this to generate a panic of selling, to generate extra revenue – by some estimates $6.5 to $7-billion.


    More in this #video #short.

    *Subscribe to my rants on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@trevorparry

    #video

    #shorts

    #paylesstax

    #capitalgains

    #LeviathanMustBeStopped

  • Want to be a good Canadian?

    🇨🇦🇨🇦 Happy Canada Day! 🇨🇦🇨🇦

    Want to be a good Canadian citizen? Take it upon yourself to understand how taxation works in this country.  Understand also what they are doing with your money.  I mean, are you getting anything for the multi-billion-dollar – or actually now, multi-trillion-dollar – debt that this government has run up in eight years?

    More in this #video #short.  Subscribe to my rants on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@trevorparry

    #taxlawyer

    #video

    #shorts

    #paylesstax

    #capitalgains

    #LeviathanMustBeStopped

  • A bust right in the chops

    The increase to the capital gains inclusion rate is more than a slap in the face to entrepreneurs. It is a bust right in the chops.

    Luckily, we have seen a great mobilization against it. But I assume it will still pass, given that the NDP will prop it up.

    More in this video short.

    Subscribe to my rants on YouTube

    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    #video
    #shorts
    #paylesstax
    #capitalgains
    #LeviathanMustBeStopped

  • Leviathan must be stopped™: an introduction

    The very concepts of individual liberty, religious liberty and enjoyment of property are facing a daily onslaught. 

    This thus the first of many short epistles to inspire people to act with regards to their most visible relationship with government: taxation. 

    What measure can a concerned citizen take today that, within the context of law and sensibility, starts to push back Leviathan – the grotesquely overreaching state? The answer is simple: starve it.

    Writing in the mid-17th century, amid over one hundred years of upheaval based on King Henry VIII’s break with Rome in 1532 and the growing emergence of the nation state as the supreme political entity in Europe, Thomas Hobbes published Leviathan.  It advocated for a social contract by which a supreme leader or autocrat would rule the masses.  Its name derived from the Biblical sea creature Leviathan – the devourer of the souls of the damned – and was also the name he gave his perception of government.  

    Hobbes saw in human nature no inalienable striving for a greater good, but rather the opposite, in which a society left ungoverned would descend into violence.  As evidenced by his famous quote, “without government, life would be solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short,” his view of the future was far from what Sir Winston Churchill would call the “broad sunlight uplands.” 

    The quintessential elements of Hobbes’s dystopian state, which he characterized as a Commonwealth, was a contract by which, in return for public safety, the ruled would give up any pretense of individual liberty.  The sovereign, whether an individual or assembly, had the power to make and enforce the law as they applied to society and property, could levy taxation ostensibly to provide for a rudimentary social safety net, had supremacy over religious belief and liberty and had wide censorship powers.  Coming from Hobbes, none of this was a surprise given that his living memory would have included stories of great religious persecutions and executions under Henry VIII, Bloody Mary, Elizabeth I, and an English Civil War that had seen King Charles I lose his head to Cromwell’s Parliamentary forces in 1849.

    We in what we collectively call The West now see the tentacles of Leviathan ever expanding, not just consuming the souls of the damned, but also the righteous.  The majoritarian justification for the ever-expanding state has been discarded for other political doctrines, such as Marxism and identity politics.  The very concepts of individual liberty, religious liberty and enjoyment of property are facing a daily onslaught.  Social media, in which some may have an opinion, regardless of any foundation in truth or academic process, has only amplified this inexorable regression to the nadir.

    Leviathan can and must be stopped.  The alternative is not an absence of government but a return to a traditional balance – what we once called liberalism – where the need for security is balanced against the inalienable reality of human liberty.  How do we succeed in what many believe to be a Sisyphean[1] exercise, but what in fact is merely Herculean[2],[3]?

    The answer is indeed broad, but also clear.  As individuals we must reassert control where the state has willingly and wrongfully intruded.  As parents we must forcefully assert that the family has been and always shall be the basic social unit.  As citizens we must understand that with rights come obligations.  An obligation to understand, not decry our history, our traditions, and our basic political system.  It is our obligation to restore society to what Edmund Burke described:

    “Society is a partnership in all science, a partnership in all art, a partnership in every virtue and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”

    What measure can a concerned citizen take today that, within the context of law and sensibility, starts to push back Leviathan? The answer is simple; starve it.

    It is the purpose of this short epistle, and those to follow, to inspire people to act with regards to their most visible relationship with government, namely taxation.  At present, taxation, both of individuals and their endeavours, is oppressive, taking too much under the chimera of fairness while confronting taxpayers with a byzantine system where seeking redress would do a disservice to the term “uphill battle.” 

    In the future I will write about substantive and strategic ways in which taxation can be delayed, deferred, and reduced, all within the parameters of an individual’s specific financial landscape and always with an eye towards risk and avoiding undue complexity.  It is always with an eye towards gravitas, which is a solemnity of manner, that solutions should be considered and implemented.  Whilst political and societal discussion need not be the focus of every edition, our common purpose to restore a sense and reality of balance and respect will always be foundational.

    I look forward to standing beside you all, certainly leading from the front, but all part of the same phalanx, with our shields and spears united in the same glorious purpose.


    [1] In Greek mythology, Hades punished Sisyphus by forcing him for eternity to roll a gargantuan boulder up a hill, only for it to roll down to the bottom each time.  Hence an impossible task.

    [2] Requiring, well, Herculean strength.

    [3] Yes, there are footnotes.